Christianity in Talmud and Midrash
Bookreader Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
- Publication date
- 1903
- Topics
- Christianity in rabbinical literature, Rabbinical literature -- Relation to the New Testament
- Publisher
- London : Williams & Norgate
- Collection
- emmanuelcollege; toronto
- Contributor
- Emmanuel - University of Toronto
- Language
- English
xvi, 449 p
Bibliography: p. xvi
Includes indexes
Bibliography: p. xvi
Includes indexes
- Addeddate
- 2006-08-29 20:31:58
- Call number
- AIB-7262
- Camera
- 1Ds
- Copyright-evidence
- Evidence reported by University of Toronto scanning center for item christianityinta00herfuoft on Aug 2, 2006; no visible notice of copyright and date found; stated date is 1903; not published by the US government; Have not checked for notice of renewal in the Copyright renewal records.
- Copyright-evidence-date
- 2006-08-02 17:23:38
- Copyright-evidence-operator
- University of Toronto scanning center
- Copyright-region
- US
- External-identifier
-
urn:oclc:record:689131339
- Foldoutcount
- 0
- Identifier
- christianityinta00herfuoft
- Identifier-ark
- ark:/13960/t58c9rf94
- Lcamid
- null
- Ocr_converted
- abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.37
- Ocr_module_version
- 0.0.21
- Openlibrary_edition
- OL7141635M
- Openlibrary_work
- OL1112680W
- Page_number_confidence
- 100
- Page_number_module_version
- 1.0.3
- Pages
- 482
- Pdf_module_version
- 0.0.23
- Possible copyright status
- NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT
- Ppi
- 500
- Rcamid
- null
- Scandate
- 20060802221038
- Scanner
- uoft1
- Scanningcenter
- uoft
- Full catalog record
- MARCXML
comment
Reviews
Reviewer:
CarolABinkley
-
-
October 13, 2023
Subject: Reply to Bookworm
Subject: Reply to Bookworm
I would like to know if there is any references to the Christian faith in the Talmud or Babylonian Amorae. If this author cannot find any, who can? After all there must be somewhere documented what Jewish thinkers thought as they saw the Roman Empire becoming Christianized. Where can I find this? The Jews were literate at that time.
Reviewer:
b00kw0rm
-
favorite -
May 26, 2010
Subject: Logicians beware
Subject: Logicians beware
After fifteen years of daily study of Talmud and using a digitized searchable database containing both Talmuds and all the classic collections of Midrash, and twelve years of researching claims about references to Christians and Jesus in Talmud, I can state that Herford fails to prove anything he says.
First he admits his debt to Heinrich Laible, who also fails to prove any of his assertions and fails to see the fallacies in what he writes.
Second, Herford cites to texts that fail to coordinate with his thesis because they contain no words relative to what he is talking about. This starts from page one of his assertions about minim where he tries to claim that Gehazi is a reference to Paul. The texts he uses can only be construed to refer to Paul by somebody who already believes it, and Herford offers no evidence from Jewish classics or from external evidence that his claim is accurate.
Finally, his claim that minim are Christians make no sense. In one, the minim are depicted as arguing against a doctrine that is fundamental to Christianity, the resurrection. Further, they reject scriptural authority for it. Either Christians accept resurrection and its scriptural basis, or they admit there is no scriptural basis for their doctrine, or they do not believe in the resurrection, if they are the minim referred to in this paragraph.
Once you eliminate everything from Herford's work that is based on bare assertions, circular logic supporting what he already believes, and nonsense, the book is empty.
First he admits his debt to Heinrich Laible, who also fails to prove any of his assertions and fails to see the fallacies in what he writes.
Second, Herford cites to texts that fail to coordinate with his thesis because they contain no words relative to what he is talking about. This starts from page one of his assertions about minim where he tries to claim that Gehazi is a reference to Paul. The texts he uses can only be construed to refer to Paul by somebody who already believes it, and Herford offers no evidence from Jewish classics or from external evidence that his claim is accurate.
Finally, his claim that minim are Christians make no sense. In one, the minim are depicted as arguing against a doctrine that is fundamental to Christianity, the resurrection. Further, they reject scriptural authority for it. Either Christians accept resurrection and its scriptural basis, or they admit there is no scriptural basis for their doctrine, or they do not believe in the resurrection, if they are the minim referred to in this paragraph.
Once you eliminate everything from Herford's work that is based on bare assertions, circular logic supporting what he already believes, and nonsense, the book is empty.
9,512 Views
20 Favorites
DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
For users with print-disabilities
IN COLLECTIONS
Emmanuel College Library, Victoria UniversityUploaded by Unknown on